Treason or Technology Transfer? Meta Whistleblower Accuses Zuckerberg of Empowering the CCP

Sussquatches Tru Matrix Score

Category	Score (1–10)	Notes
Primary Evidence Quality	7	Based on sworn Senate testimony and published memoir
Source Credibility	6	Whistleblower + media coverage; Rumble lacks editorial review
Source Ownership Transparency	5	Liberty Daily is openly partisan but transparent
Verification Feasibility	7	Testimony and book are verifiable
Topic Status (Relevance)	9	Ongoing Senate inquiries; high public interest

Total Score: 6.8/10 – Moderately Credible

*This analysis reflects available data and testimony as of April 2025. Scores are based on the Sussquatches Tru Matrix credibility framework.

The Allegations

A new Rumble video titled "Treason: META Whistleblower Confirms Zuckerberg Gave AI Intelligence to the CCP" features claims based on testimony from Sarah Wynn-Williams, a former Meta executive. In sworn testimony before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Subcommittee in April 2024, Wynn-Williams stated that Meta shared sensitive AI technology and expertise with China.

What She Said

Wynn-Williams, who authored the memoir Careless People, made the following core allegations:

• Project Aldrin: Meta executives allegedly briefed the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) on AI development as part of their push to enter China’s tech market.
• Censorship Tool Creation: Meta built an internal censorship framework for Chinese regulators as early as 2015.
• AI Export via Open Source: Meta’s open-source AI model LLaMA was allegedly used by Chinese entities, including the military-linked DeepSeek AI.
• Misleading Congress: Wynn-Williams accused CEO Mark Zuckerberg of perjury, stating Meta misrepresented its activities in China to U.S. lawmakers.

Why It Matters

The accusations strike at the heart of national security concerns. In recent years, the U.S. government has cracked down on AI-related exports to China, particularly tools that could empower military or surveillance applications. If true, the charges could show how Big Tech’s market ambitions compromised American strategic advantage.

Sources and Corroboration

These claims were reported by multiple outlets, including:

• New York Post (April 2025)
• U.S. Senate Judiciary Subcommittee archives
• The Liberty Daily (syndicated the video content)

Can It Be Verified?

While some claims (such as the book and Senate testimony) are verifiable, others—like private internal Meta communications or exact AI implementation details in China—are not yet public. Meta has declined to comment on specifics but acknowledged their open-source AI can be freely used.

Final Take

The video’s claims are bolstered by credible testimony, though amplified by a partisan outlet. While the phrase “treason” is provocative, the underlying facts merit further scrutiny by lawmakers and national security experts. The debate over open-source AI’s global consequences is just beginning.